Church
Purity Preserved By Discipline
Elder
O. B. Mink
Pastor
- Sovereign Grace Baptist Church
Texarkana,
Texas
"
Purge
out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump ..."
I Corinthians
5:7
The Lord knowing that His churches would be made up of impure people, a
people who would all too often give vent to their old nature, gave His
churches a disciplinary formula and authority to effectively deal with
every infraction of the moral and doctrinal standards He had delineated
and committed to their keeping. Love for God and reverence for His word
is the root from which purity grows, and every deviation from the disciplinary
criteria which the Lord gave His churches, no matter how insignificant
it may seem, is done at the cost of purity and respect for the Lord's church.
Every Baptist church should experience a consistent maturation process.
However, we must remember and clearly understand that this imperative growth
or progress is inextricably bonded to the exercise of church discipline.
Churches that fail to exercise discipline, will retrogress in its every
relationship to God, and will be chastened of the Lord. It is through the
medium of discipline that decency and order is maintained in the church.
The God of the Bible is the perfect disciplinarian: "For whom the Lord
loveth, He chasteneth, but He (does it) for our profit that we might
be partakers of His holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth
to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable
fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby" (Hebrews
12:6, 10,11). The words "Chastise" and "Discipline" are perfect synonyms,
and when applied by the church, it is for the sake and development of both,
the church and the erring member.
Every New Testament church is an entity with divinely vouchsafed autonomy,
whereby the church is enabled to deal with and alleviate their problems.
Notwithstanding, no church can ever arrive in its earthly tenure where
discipline is no longer needed, but every church can by being consistent
in the practice of discipline mitigate its heartaches. Obedience to Scripture
is the ground of resourcefulness, and a church that is faithful in its
practice of discipline will minimize its impediments. Discipline purifies
the church, and the offspring of spiritual purity is church unity.
Conversely, "A child left to himself will bring his mother to shame,"
and an undisciplined church offender will bring an obvious nature to the
church (Proverbs 29:15; I Corinthians 5:6).
Church discipline often runs counter to the emotions and sentiment of some
members of the church, but a church seeking the honor of God, the preservation
of church purity, and the good of the subject, should not be deterred by
the unwarranted feelings of some members in so vital a matter. When the
church has exhausted all of its options, and is left without any further
recourse, it must for the favor of God and the welfare of the church, invoke
the biblically prescribed discipline, lest the church be found guilty of
harboring iniquity (I Corinthians 13:6).
The purpose of discipline is not to unchurch, but to inchurch the erring
member, and this lofty end should be diligently sought by the church. Whether
or not the desired climax is realized, the church will be strengthened
by its endeavor to keep itself pure. If the disciplined person is caused
to see his error, and comes to the realization that the church was not
unfair toward him in its handling of the matter, he will then know that
the church was all the while seeking his good. He will own his mistake,
approve the action of the church, and will seek realignment with the church.
But if the offensive member is left undisciplined, he will by his evil
example entice others to disrespect church authority.
God has authorized and qualified His churches to administer discipline
(II
Thessalonians 3:6,14) and the church which fails to practice this divine
injunction will suffer spiritual suffocation, which will, if not corrected,
culminate in fearful rejection of the disobedient church by the Lord Jesus
Christ.
One of the first things the military gives a new recruit is a book of rules,
for the military knows it cannot function effectively without discipline.
No government can long endure without discipline, and neither can a family.
The Benjamin Spock philosophy which advises parents to turn their kids
loose, and they will discover by themselves how to cope with the world,
has wrought havoc in a great number of families. It is the parents' responsibilities
to bring their children up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Ephesians
6:4; Proverbs 22:6). What is true with governments and families in
the matter of discipline is super imposed on the church, for it is in the
church that the glory of God is to be seen throughout all ages (Ephesians
3:21).
Excisive discipline can be the means of relieving the church of many ills
and difficulties, but the church needs to ever keep in mind that no form
or measure of discipline absolves guilt, and it is for this reason the
church should guard against making the excluded person feel comfortable
with his exclusion. It is not that the love of the church for the debarred
person has diminished, but for the discipline to achieve the desired end,
which is restoration of the excluded person to church membership. There
is of necessity a circumscription of all spiritual relationship with the
excludee. Bounds must be set by the church which tends toward making the
excluded person acutely aware of what he has forfeited by his exclusion.
These forfeitures are of such a nature, that the excluded person cannot
be productive in any phase of his spiritual stewardship, and this spiritual
disability of the excluded person leaves no room for church fellowship
with him (Ephesians 5:11)
The purpose of ecclesiastical ostracism should invariably be instructive,
and free of undue castigation. The church has no punitive power that allows
for physical infliction. It is in this divinely disallowed area of discipline
that Romanism and Protestantism have shamefully and brutally erred, resulting
in multiplied millions of Baptist martyrs. There is no room in church discipline
for one carnal stripe, much less forty. How much more then is the guilt
of blood letting Romanism and Protestantism!
God has committed the keeping of the spiritual sword to His church (Ephesians
6:17), and has thereby given His churches power to judge those within
their membership. Conversely, God has placed the carnal sword in the hands
of divinely ordained governments (Romans, 13:1-4), and there can
never in this world be a God pleasing merger of the two.
Paul instructed the church at Corinth to exclude the incestuous man, and
keep no company with him (I Corinthians 5:11). All spiritual intercourse
with the excluded person should be in the main, if not altogether, restricted
to rebuke and admonition; for anything more could cause the church offender
to have a toned down conception of his exclusion. Patronizing of the excluded
person in his contention against the church will cause confusion in the
church, and confusion is the ground from which discord grows and discord
is the mother of excessive criticism and this undue criticism is the begetter
of alienation.
The common and hateful result of alienation within the membership of the
church is spiritual deterioration and a further detraction of members.
But this catastrophic situation can be avoided by realizing that hostility
is an emotion of the carnal heart, and is never more wrong than when directed
toward a sister or brother within the church family.
"For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil
work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable,
gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without
partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown
in peace of them that make peace" (James 3:16 - 18). The cause of the
spiritual decline of a church is from within the church, and never from
without. This is why Paul warned the Galatian churches, saying: "But
if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one
of another" (Galatians 5:15). Notwithstanding, some usurpers of peace
from without may try and exert an evil influence upon the church, but they
can do nothing to hurt the church unless the church allows it.
Accord and affinity are God bestowed blessings, and are to be promoted
by the church, and protected by the church, with just and merited discipline.
Offenses will come (Luke 17:1), but the church that owns the rule
of God in its government is more than equal to the offense, and will when
the need arises use its disciplinary authority to preserve the peace and
nobility of the church.
The church should never lose sight of its coveted objective in the exercise
of excisive discipline, which is to correct and reclaim the excluded person.
Therefore, it is the obligation of the entire membership of the church
to be exceedingly careful in its relationship to the excluded person, so
as to do nothing that would impair the effectiveness of the discipline,
and thereby cause the church to come short of its cherished goal (Romans
16:17; James 5:20).
Excisive discipline may seem at first to some to be unduly rigid or severe,
but it is not so, for there is no element of cruelty in it, and it is not
without pardoning flexibility. When the U.S. Marines drums one out of the
Corp, he is stripped of all identification with the Corp, his buttons and
insignias are torn from his uniform, and he is sent on his way; never to
be restored to the Corp. Sister branches of the military would not for
the briefest moment consider receiving the dishonorably discharged Corpsman
into their branch of the military. But the excisive discipline of the church
is not that absolute, but has an amazing remedial power in it, whereby
the discharged person may be joyfully restored to membership in the church.
However, there is a growing and prevailing tendency toward disrespect among
the Lord's churches for the disciplinary authority of sister churches.
The autonomy and independence of the local church should never be infringed
upon by any external power, and we need to remember that church independence
does not include the right for a church to ignore the disciplinary authority
of churches of like faith and order. Nevertheless, some churches and pastors
in defense of receiving excluded people, say: "No church or preacher can
tell our church whom we may receive or not receive into our membership."
This haughty attitude and conduct has been the means of sundering long
standing friendships, and has gone far in negating the authority of local
churches over their membership.
No two New Testament churches are totally free of practical or doctrinal
variance, and in some cases the nature of the variance is such, that so
as to avoid rivalry, fellowship between the varying churches must be and
will be accordingly circumscribed. But New Testament churches should never
be competitors one with another, and should rejoice at the betterment of
conditions in every sister church. Howbeit, and to our shame, this is not
always the case.
It is possible for a church to err in its practice of excisive discipline,
but it is not likely. Moreover, no sister church is better qualified to
judge in the matter than the church that administered the discipline. When
a child is disciplined by its Mother, it does not run to the house of its
Aunt, and say: "My Mother gave me a whipping, and I want to live at your
house." If such an instance occurred the Aunt would tell the child, "You
go straight home, and apologize to your Mother." The Aunt's motive in rebuking
the child, is deep concern for the welfare of the child, and love and respect
for her sister. However, it appears in our time that this kind of honor
between sister churches is disgracefully on the wane.
After the offending brother has become obdurate and disregards the twice
repeated effort toward reconciliation by the offended brother, Christ said:
" Tell it to the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him
be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican" (Matthew 18:15-17).
In these words Christ was speaking by way of anticipation to all of His
churches, and while the words "heathen" and "publican" are not synonymous
with reprobation, they do mean one with whom there can be no church fellowship
(Romans
16:17, II Thessalonians 3:14).
Ethics has never reached a higher plain than that which is found in the
government of New Testament Baptist churches, and never moreso than in
the matter of church discipline. This is why excisive discipline is the
last measure to be used by the church in its effort to reconcile an erring
member. When a member is scripturally excluded from a New Testament Baptist
church, it is divinely incumbent upon all sister churches to honor the
action of the disciplining church, for Christ speaking to His churches,
said:
"Whatsoever
ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall
loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 18:18).
This is an awesome truth, but it does not say, there is absolutely no way
an excluded person can be taken into the membership of a church of like
faith and order. But it does emphatically teach that ALL New Testament
churches should be exceedingly careful so as not to receive people into
their membership whose exclusion is "bound" in heaven. GOD FORBID!
No man can ever extricate himself from his responsibility to God, and no
bona fide church member can ever bring his responsibility to the Lord's
church to a conclusion. Exclusion of a person from the membership of a
New Testament Baptist church does not terminate the excluded person's responsibility
to the excluding church. On the contrary, exclusion draws attention to
his shortcomings, and highlights his responsibility and duty toward the
amendment of his error and his need of reconciliation to the church.
While the excluded person is not, during the time of his exclusion, under
any further disciplinary authority of the church, he is yet subject of
the authority of the Head of the church, Jesus Christ, and will be dealt
with by the unerring government of God. Adam's exclusion from the garden
of paradise did not absolve or free him of his responsibility to God. The
excluded person is yet a subject of Divine authority, and his primary duty
is to repent of his offense against the church and seek restoration of
membership in the church.
Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it (Ephesians 5:25),
and the highest honor this side of a person's experiential adoption into
the family of God, is to be a member of one of the Lord's precious churches.
It is the unabating responsibility of every member to keep the glory of
God in the church untarnished, for it is a blemish less Bride that enters
the marriage chambers in glory (Ephesians 5:27).
(The
Baptist Herald - October, 1992 )
Return
To O. B. Mink Page
Return To PBC Home