CHRISTIANS
AND XMAS
By Daniel Parks
No day like Christmas can be found in all the world. It is marked as a
holiday, complete with the closing of stores, feasts, gift exchanges, special
liturgies and other religious festivities, revelry, drunkenness, and paganism.
Religious observances are marked with religious plays depicting the birth
of the Christ in Bethlehem, along with the visits of the shepherds and
magi (usually unbiblically portrayed as one group of men) and the animals
around which the scene took place, a stable. Many times presents are prepared
to be taken to families that are needy, bands and singing groups go caroling
through the neighborhoods, special sermons are preached with the so-called
“Christmas Story” as the topic, and special Christmas hymns are sung.
Profane observances, parties, festivals, etc. cause this holiday to cause
the biggest month of the year for the sale and use of alcoholic beverages,
party favors, and the other things that go with such festivities. In these
circles Christmas brings revelry, drunkenness, debauchery, and a host of
other sins. Stores enjoy their most productive month during December, the
Christmas month. Usually, the people within these two groups are one and
the same.
Its popularity is not to be questioned, it is here, and seemingly here
to stay. But there is one question that needs to be answered: Is the Christian
to observe it? In order to decide this issue, the background of Christmas
must be analyzed. Ample information is available to the student, and some
of that information will appear in this work. This work is by no means
complete, but it is sufficient.
FACTS
The
name, Christmas, is of Roman Catholic origin. It is made of two words,
Christ’s Mass.
The mass is a special service conducted by the Papists for the purpose
of worshipping their gods, of which Christ is but one (Mariolatry and some
select saints are also worshipped). The name has become to be so universally
known that its form has been shortened to Christmas since the sixteenth
century. Many folk today refer to it as simply Xmas, since in the Greek
language the first letter in Christ is ‘X’, and many make reference to
Christ in writing by that mark. Any child of God should revolt at the mere
insinuation that he observe anything with a mass, especially the Christ
Mass. The word does not appear in the Bible, since it is of such recent
origin.
The date, December 25, has a direct tie in to the idolatrous worship of
the sun, and that date is universally known as the birthday of the sun.
Prior to that day, the days are getting shorter and the nights longer.
But, on December 25, the sun is born, and the days begin to get longer
again. In Babylon and other lands where such worship existed, much prayer
was given to the sun-god, and the birthday of the sun was a day of joy,
laughter, and reveling. Some of the gods worshipped on this day were Mithra,
Osiris, Horus, Hercules, Bacchus, Adonis, Jupiter, and Tammuz of Babylon.
In Rome, the day was known as Saturnalia, ‘the feast of Saturn’, and was
celebrated much like the modern Christmas with much ungodliness.
The reason for the date, December 25, is because of the emergence of papalism
with the other religions of this world. As papalism began to grow, it acquired
riches, armies, lands, worldly honor, and strength. With these it began
to expand its borders into the lands of pagans. Many of these pagans were
quite unwilling to give up the worshipping of their gods, but since the
papists demanded that they must, either annihilation of the conquered or
a good compromise, satisfactory to both parties was needed. That compromise
was found by simply adopting the parts of the pagan worship the pagans
refused to abandon, and incorporating them into the papal system.
Since December 25 was worshipped as the birthday of the sun-god (and is
not Christ the ‘light of the world’), that day was set apart as the Christ
Mass, the birth of Jesus. In this way, both pagan and papist could worship
together, and though both were directing their adoration to the same image,
each had a different god in mind. This was done by Pope Liberius in 354.
All people celebrating Christmas celebrate on this day with but very few
exceptions, among them the Armenians, who still observe January 6 (known
as the Epiphany, or, the day of the visit by the magi according to Westerners,
or the day of Christ’s baptism according to Easterners). Christmas used
to be celebrated to some extent on this day, and many folk still refer
to it as “Little Christmas.”
Was Christ born on December 25? The odds are against it, but as surely
as it cannot be proven that He was, it cannot be proven that He was not.
There are reasons that seem to show that He was not, and none to show that
He was. Among those that show He could not have been born on this day is
the fact that there were shepherds in the fields watching their flocks
on this night, and this was a most unlikely occurrence for December 25.
John Gill in his commentary makes the following note on Luke 2:8,
“And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field,
keeping watch over their flock by night”:
“There are two sorts of cattle with the Jews ... there are the cattle of
the house that lie in the city; the cattle of the wilderness are they that
lie in the pastures. On which one of the commentators (Maimonides, in MISN,
BETZA, cap. 5, sect. 7), observes, ‘These lie in the pastures which are
in the villages, all the days of the cold and heat, and do not go into
the cities until the rains descend.’ The first rain falls in the month
Marchesvan, which answers to the latter part of our October and the former
part of November ... From which it appears that Christ must be born before
the middle of October, since the first rain was not yet come.”
It also stands to reason that the Romans would not schedule a tax collection
during the roughest part of the year, for the men were making trips across
the country and back to their hometowns. If any should wonder as to the
severity of the weather in the Judean winter, let him remember that Jesus
Christ said when speaking of the travail of the latter days, “But pray
yet that your flight be not in the winter” (Matthew 24:20),
for winter is quite severe.
Furthermore, the apostolic churches did not celebrate it, for Chrysostom
(Monitum in Hom. de Natal. Christi), writing in Antioch about A.D. 380
says: “It is not yet ten years since this day was made known to us.”
Can the date be ascertained? No, but some claim that they can pinpoint
the time of the year (see Ralph Woodrow’s BABYLON MYSTERY RELIGION, pages
161-162). It was more than likely in the fall of the year, since taxes
were usually collected after the harvests and since Jerusalem was so crowded
at the time of His birth, the Feast of Tabernacles was probably taking
place. This would explain why Mary went with Joseph, since only the men
were compelled to go to the taxing. But, no reliable evidence points to
His birth as late as December 25. Therefore, the evidence points to these
facts: the date is of pagan origin, the papists incorporated it into their
religion, and most Christians go along with the idea.
The Christmas tree, another pagan God, is also a part of many Christian’s
Christmas ritual, even though God’s Word expressly forbids it. “Thus
saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen ... For the customs of
the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work
of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and
with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.
They (the tree gods - ed.) are upright as the palm tree, but speak
not; they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of
them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.”
(Jeremiah 10:2-5).
The worship of tree gods is common to many lands. It is said that Adonis,
the Sun-god, had a mother that became a tree and while in that state, Adonis
grew out of her (does that qualify him as “the branch”, a name for Jesus
Christ?). The Bible ofttimes mentions the prophets of the groves, where
trees were worshipped. The Scandinavians were ardent tree worshippers.
A legend tells us that Boniface (Winfred), an English missionary, came
upon a group of heathen near an oak tree about to sacrifice a child at
it. But, Boniface cut the oak down, and then an evergreen appeared. Winfred
convinced the pagans the evergreen stood for Christ, so they all worshipped
the evergreen tree.
In fact, almost every group of people worshipped trees in some fashion,
but the practice of the Christmas tree goes back to the origin of idolatry.
Babylon, where it was believed that Semiramis, the mother of Tammuz, claimed
that overnight an evergreen tree sprang up from a dead tree stump. The
dead stump supposedly symbolized her dead husband Nimrod; the new evergreen
tree was the symbol that Nimrod had come to life again in the person of
Tammuz! This belief and tree worship spread to other lands, and the Papists
incorporated it also into their system.
Do Christians worship the trees? They say they do not, but the act of approaching
the tree, kneeling and putting gifts under it must appear very familiar
to the pagans that have been doing thus for centuries. And, what is the
difference in having a Christmas tree and observing the accompanying ritual
and having a statue of Buddha or some other pagan god and observing a like
ritual? There is none whatsoever, except they may feel that the Christmas
tree is now “Christianized.”
Gift exchanging is likewise of pagan origin, deeply a part of the Roman
Saturnalia, who borrowed it from the Greeks (along with the giving of freedom
to slaves for a period, wax candles, and others). This pagan practice was
easily incorporated into papalism when it was observed that the magi brought
gifts to the Christ child. But, in almost every Christmas play, the Biblical
account is misconstrued so as to have the shepherds represented as bearing
the gifts. Actually, the magi did not arrive to see the child until some
time after His birth. By that time, Jesus was living in a house, not a
stable (Matthew 2:9-11), and there they presented (not exchanged)
their gifts. Our modern practice of exchanging gifts comes from the papal
incorporation of a pagan practice, which permitted the pagans to continue
as they had, and introduced the practice to the papist subjects as being
the Biblical thing to do. There is nothing wrong with the exchanging of
gifts, but when it is done in this manner it is simply the continuation
of a pagan form.
Santa Claus is yet another pagan form, though probably one of the most
recent. Santa Claus and St. Nicholas are usually taken to be the same person,
but of different lands. The Norwegian counterpart is Kris Kringle, whose
name is a corruption of Kristkindlein, the “Christ Child” (“corruption”
is putting it mildly).
Santa Claus is an anti-Christ in the flesh, complete with the attributes
of the Almighty Jehovah. As Jehovah’s foremost attribute and demand is
holiness (“Be ye holy for I am holy”), so is Santa Claus, because
a popular song about him says:
“You better watch out,
you better not cry,
You better not pout,
I’m telling you why
Santa Claus is coming
to town.”
Many mothers get their little children to behave prior to this season by
telling them they won’t get anything for Christmas if they don’t. Santa
Claus is also omniscient, because:
“He knows when
you’ve been sleeping,
He knows when you’re
awake,
He knows if you’ve
been bad or good
So be good for goodness’
sake.”
He is likewise omnipotent, for he can take a sled and eight reindeer through
the sky. He is also omnipresent, for at midnight on Christmas Eve he is
in every chimney. He also performs miracles, and one time when a young
boy was cut up, this man found the pieces and put him back together again.
Any child that believes in Santa Claus has no need for God.
Other pagan forms borrowed from the pagans and incorporated into papal
system, and eventually borrowed by Christians include kissing under the
mistletoe, the Yule log, and the eating of boar and geese.
CONCLUSION
Should
the Christian celebrate Christmas? Reasons for celebrating Christmas are
usually either “because it is traditional (i.e., “I always have,,” or “everyone
else does”) or “because it is so romantic and full of feeling.” As to the
former, the tradition is pagan and papal, and if one has no quarrel with
observing those kinds of traditions, he can justify himself for observing
it. But, the tradition of the Anabaptists has been to disdain it. Oliver
Cromwell and the Puritans banned it in England in 1642 as being anti religious,
the American Puritans banned it in 1643, and it did not become a legal
holiday in the United States until 1856, when the traditions of other lands
overcame the religious spirit that had prevailed before. As for the latter
reason, no Biblicist should be caught using sentiments as a reason for
celebrating something so diametrically opposed to God’s Word.
Some celebrate in ignorance, but “ignorance of the law is no excuse.” Checking
into any reliable encyclopedia will confirm the conclusion of this paper,
and therefore the reader can no longer plead ignorance.
Reasons for not celebrating have already been discussed in the body of
this paper, and will not be elaborated here except to say that the whole
ritual is pagan, and without any Biblical basis whatsoever.
(The Baptist Examiner - 12/29/1979)
Return
To Pagan Days Page
Return To PBC Home